Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.
Research proposal not a research paper. Find an article in a social work research journal (such as Research on Social Work Practice or Social Work Research or The Journal of Human Services: Training, Research, & Practice) that reports a research study. Discuss how the study used theory as the foundation for the study. search for an article in mental illness in adolescence Write a summary of the study discussing how it is relevant to the proposed study. Provide a critique of the article by reviewing the followering“How to Critique a Journal Article”
Review the Individual Assignment
1. Name(s) of the author(s)
2. Title of article
3. Title of journal, volume number, date, month and page numbers
4. Statement of the problem or issue discussed
5. The author’s purpose, approach or methods, hypothesis, and major conclusions.
Include the following as appropriate:
Is the title of the article appropriate and clear?Is the abstract specific, representative of the article, and in the correct form?Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?Do you find errors of fact and interpretation? (This is a good one! You won’t believe how often authors misinterpret or misrepresent the work of others. You can check on this by looking up for yourself the references the author cites.)Is all of the discussion relevant?Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? Suggest specific revisions.Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted?Are the author’s statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how clarity can be a chieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author’s.What underlying assumptions does the author have?Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?